法律英语翻译网站 法律英语翻译app

法律英语翻译（中文翻译成英文）

太多了，真的要翻译也是要收费的。不过你可以在这个网站试一试，宋雷法律英语翻译网，

法律英语翻译网站 法律英语翻译app

法律英语翻译网站 法律英语翻译app

法律英语翻译网站 法律英语翻译app

它不仅意味着被逮捕人的人身自由受到最严格的限制，而且法律允许对其进行较长The arrest in our country Law of Criminal Procedure precautionary measure

有哪些好用、专业的法律英语词典app?

百度翻译app。

百度翻译依托互联网数据资源和自然语言处理技术优势，致力于帮助用户跨越语言鸿沟，方便快捷地获取信息和服务。支持全球200多个语言互译，包括中文（简体）、英语、日语等，覆盖4万多个翻译方向，通过开放平台支持超过40万企业和个人开发者，是国内市场份额的翻译类产品。

百度翻译拥有网页、APP、百度小程序等多种产品形态，此外还针对开发者提供开放云接口服务，日均响应千亿字符翻译请求。除文本、网页翻译外，推出了文档翻译、翻译、拍照翻译、语音翻译等多模态的翻译功能，以及海量例句、权威词典等丰富的外语资源，实用口语、英语跟读、英语短视频、AI背单词等外语学习功能，满足用户多样性的翻译需求和学习需求。

针对具有音频转写、字幕翻译需求的用户，推出AI视频翻译一键生成双语字幕；针对个人学习、企业内部参考等需求，结合机器的快捷与人工的精准优势，提供“AI翻译+人工校对”服务；针对商业发布、播出级影视翻译制作需求，提供一对一定制方案。

针对有会议同传需求的用户，推出百度AI同传会议版，支持线下、线上多种会议形式，提供双语字幕投屏、手机边听边看、行业术语定制、查看会议记录等功能；针对看视频、听音频、在线会议交流等场景，推出了百度AI同传助手，能够拾取电脑声音，实时生成同传双语字幕，辅助跨语言的信息获取和交流。

学习法律英语的网站

最全的法律英语学习网站大汇总

两个实用的法律英语学习微信公众号：

一个是“LEC法律英语考试资讯”：这个平台分享LEC考试的动态，更重要的是，推送很多法律英语知识，还有真题解析。

第二个是“法律英语教学与测试”：这个平台推送的文章偏学术性，是系统了解美国法律的不错资源。

胡歌那个英语网站不错，胡歌哦教你英语你会进步的。

应该是这个

法律英语在线翻译

"冲突正义" 与 "实质正义"

就选择法律目的而言，基本理论二分法作用于两者间：以选择适当的法律体系来解决多国争端为目的，或以在个例中得到可获得的最公平结果为目的。显然，传统理论，即记载中所指的管辖权选择规则，鲁莽的选择一个仅由有争议的连接因素控制到法律体系，而不考虑其内容。这样的做法必然会引发“冲突正义”和“实质正义”矛盾的产生，批评大多立足于抨击和证明一个事实：法庭实际在通过重新定性争议涉及的法律条款、公共秩序保留，甚至是驱逐出境等规避方法来逃脱管辖权盲选。另一方面，现论以一种或另一种方式支持正义。鉴于只有不到四分之一的美洲仍沿用传统理论，实质正义在某些方面来说可以算是普遍观点。

问题相当复杂，但是，现论就这一问题并没有同意观点，而是仅仅一个广泛的连续体发表观点且观点所涉范围甚广......

“冲突正义”对“物质正义”[8]

(1)法律选择目的的基本理论二分法在于，选择“适当的”法律体系来管理多国争端的目标和在个案中寻求尽可能公平的结果的目标。显而易见，在之前的历史笔记中描述的传统理论声称是有选择性的司法管辖，无论其内容如何，都是通过关键的关联因素向法律体系的飞跃。因此，它“冲突正义”与“物质正义”的目标，尽管其批评者将他们的大部分攻击建立在事实上正在避免盲目的管辖权选择的之上，例如通过对争议中所涉及的法律范畴的重新定性、维护公共秩序，甚至使用反致制度。另一方面，现论都以这样或那样的方式声称要考虑实质正义。由于少于四分之一的美国州仍然坚持传统理论，因此必须说，某种形式的追求实质正义的目标是主流观点。

(2)然而，这个问题非常复杂，因为现论在这个问题上没有统一的立场，而是代表了一个广泛连续统一体上的观点。这些观点的范畴相当值得注意。

“冲突正义与实质正义”[ 8 ]（1）的基本理论dichotomyin法律选择的目的是选择“正确”的法律制度，治理一个多争端或目的达到公平的可能结果在个别情况下，目标之间。很明显，传统理论在前面的历史说明声称被管辖的选择性，与冒险的法律indicated的关键连接因素不管其内容。它thussubscribes的“冲突正义”与“实质正义”的目的，但大部分在，管辖权实际上是避免盲目选择通过这样的evasionsas卷入争议法律范畴的重新鉴定攻击的批评，艺术的公共秩序，甚至使用反致。现论，另一方面，所有声称在一种或另一种方式采取实质正义的考虑。由于低于美国四分之一仍坚持传统的理论，因此它必须说，某些形式的目标追求实质正义是普遍的看法。（2）问题是非常复杂的，然而，事实moderntheories没有统一的对这一问题的立场，而是代表了一个广泛的连续点。这些点的方位是很了不起。

The fundamental theoretical dichotomyin the pures of cho of law is between the objective of choosing the“proper” legal to govern a multi-state dis or the objective ofreaching the fairest sible result in the individual case. It is clear thatthe traditional theory described in the preceding historical note purports tobe jurisdiction-selective, with a leap in the dark to the legal indicated by the critical connecting factor regardless of its content. It thussubscribes to the objective of “conflicts just” versus “material just”,although its critics based much of their attack on demonstrations that thecourts were in fact oiding blind jurisdiction-selection through such evasionsas re-characterization of the legal category involved in the controversy, thedefense of ordre public, or n use of renvoi. The modern theories, on theother hand, all purport in one way or another to take substantive just intoaccount. Since less than one fourth of the American states still adhere to thetraditional theory, it must therefore be said that some form of pursuit of theobjective of substantive just is the prevailing view.

“冲突正义”和“我的…

法律英语在线翻译

Network of rmation technology, rapid dlopment and wide application to bring people in a convenient, speedy way of life and enormous commercial interests, but also to protect the privacy of people he brought new challenges. Online pract violations, especially against the network of frequent incidents of privacy, the privacy legislation to protect network theory and pract to become a hot issue. Countries in the world today are aware of privacy on the network to carry out the urgency of the protection of the law, and at present no specific legal provisions of China's right to privacy. Only through the provisions of reputation to protect, the protection of privacy on the network and it is the legislative gap. Therefore examination of the relevance of the protection of foreign models, combined with China's national conditions, to introduce legislation to regulate the -oriented, to be complemented by industry self-regulation, technology protection and government regulation, at the same time, foster civic awareness of the protection of personal privacy, privacy on the network in order to achi effective protection. In this , by studying the United States and the European Union, represented by the two legislative models as well as China's in the network status of privacy legislation on the construction of legislation to protect the privacy of our network made a number of countermeasures and suggestions. Network so as to promote China's legal protection of privacy mechani, to fully protect the privacy of the pure of the network.

The rapid dlopment of rmation technology network and application, bring in people convenient, quick way of life and the great commercial interests, but also give people the protection of privacy has brought new challenges. Online pract violations, particularly violations of the privacy of network frequent, privacy laws that protect a network theory and pract of a hot issue. Today's world is aware of network privacy protection, and the urgency of China law stipulates privacy. Only through the reputation of the provisions on the protection of network privacy protection more of legislation. So should try to use for reference foreign related to protected mode, and combined with actual situation in China, to regulate, supplemented by the self-discipline, technical protection and government regulation, at the same time, establish the citizens to protect the privacy of personal consciousness, in order to realize the effective protection of network privacy. This , through studying in the United States and the European Union represented by the two legislative mode and current network privacy legislation in China, to construct network privacy legislation protect , puts forward some countermeasures and Suggestions. In order to promote our network privacy of the legal protection mechani consummation, achi full of network privacy.

Labor

dis

is

to

show

unit

of

choose

and

employ

persons

and

laborer,

based

on

labor

contract

and

related

laws

and

regulations

or

unit

of

choose

and

employ

persons

labor

formed

labor

contract

relationship

or

factual

labor

to

concern

and

controversy

of

rights

and

obligations.Labor

diss

in

the

dis

settlement

mechani,

inevitably

involve

the

burden

of

proof.

Current

laws

will

labor

dis

into

the

civil

procedure

law,

the

scope

of

labor

relations

besides

general

civil

legal

relationship

of

equality,

also

has

its

unique

membership,

RenShenXing

etc.

In

labor

relations,

unit

of

choose

and

employ

persons,

laborer

is

one

side

were

mars,

between

the

mars

are

not

equal

status

in

the

burden

on

the

ability,

also

he

obvious

difference.

But

for

the

allocation

of

the

burden

of

labor

dis

is

stipulated,

the

problem

of

the

concrete

pract

against.

In

the

labor

dis

arbitration

or

litigation

of

burden

for

more

detailed

division,

with

scientific

proof

responsibility

theory

in

perfect,

better

fairness,

solving

labor

diss.

This

tries

to

discuss

the

labor

relations,

namely

the

adjustment

by

law

shall,

labor

relations,

is

akind

of

special

labor

relations.

Labor

relations

with

the

will

of

the

state

and

the

main

properties

and

will

concurrently,

equality

and

personal

relationship

and

property

relationship

with

nature.

According

to

different

classification

mod,

the

labor

dis

is

divided

into

the

individual

and

the

collective

controversy,

group

dis;

Rights

and

interests

and

confirmation

of

diss,

payment

of

controversy

and

alteration

of

controversy,

Confirmation

of

dis,

payment

of

diss,

the

change

of

dis.

In

case

the

authorities

are

faced

with

the

burden

of

proof

allocation

problem.

The

problems

in

the

distribution

of

the

burden

of

proof,

different

theories.

There

is

alegal

requirement

is

representative

of

the

classification,

probability,

the

er

field.

In

civil

lawsuit

legal

requirement

basically

adopts

the

theory

of

distribution

classified

said

proof

responsibility.

And

according

to

the

provisions

of

labor

dis

proof

responsibility,

referring

to

the

labor

dis

mediation

and

arbitration

law,

regulations

and

judicial

interpretations

evidence

and

the

administrative

regulations,

the

provisions

of

the

way

is

clear

evidence

rules

and

regulations

of

the

article

6of

the

labor

dis,

but

the

burden

of

proof

is

too

general

and

narrow.

Overall,

about

labor

dis,

below

the

proof

：

（1）A

labor

dis

case

of

lack

of

clear

proof

responsibility

theory

guidance

（2）The

judicial

interpretation

of

labor

dis

lawsuit

which

determine

the

distribution

of

proof

responsibility

too

narrow

range

（3）The

judicial

interpretation

of

the

allocation

of

the

burden

that

does

not

conform

to

the

legal

requirements

classification

said

（4）Evidence

rules

of

labor

dis

the

burden

distribution

does

not

conform

to

the

provisions

of

the

burden

On

the

distribution

of

labor

dis,

the

burden

of

proof

for

different

scholars.

Some

scholars

think,

according

to

labor

dis

7diss,

pay

diss,

mament

and

labor

contract

dis

distribution

proof

responsibility,

Some

scholars

think

in

labor

law

relations

between

the

essence

of

unequal

status,

in

order

to

effectively

protect

worker,

should

execute

compley

burden.

The

author

argues

that

the

labor

dis,

the

distribution

of

proof

of

labor

law,

according

to

labor

law

entity

proved

the

allocation

of

responsibility.

At

the

same

time,

the

burden

of

proof

for

the

distribution

of

labor

dis,

must

consider

our

about

the

inherent

theoretical

proof

responsibility

allotment,

it

has

now

been

gradually

mature

proof

responsibility

distribution

theory

blind

pursue

path.

In

labor

diss

in

the

allocation

of

the

burden

of

proof,

the

following

aspects

should

be

taken

into

consideration:

1.With

alegal

requirement

for

the

classification

of

the

burden

of

proof

that

fundamental

principle

of

distribution

2.On

the

basis

of

equal

to

protect

the

lawful

rights

and

interests

of

the

parties

3.In

the

legislation

should

be

fully

clear

proof

of

labor

dis

the

allocation

of

responsibility

principle

and

For

labor

dis

the

burden

of

proof,

the

distribution

of

specific

rules

of

civil

procedure

to

borrow

in

lawsuit

classification

theories

of

labor

dis,

the

types

and

the

civil

lawsuit

classification

theories

of

combination

of

labor

dis

into

confirmation

(of),

to

FuXing

labor

dis

(payment)

and

change

the

defense

of

the

labor

dis

(the),

the

burden

of

proof.

On

the

burden

of

proof

for

distribution

of

labor

dis,

laborer

still

exists

weak

evidence.

Unit

of

choose

and

employ

persons

in

the

arbitration

and

litigation

are

likely

to

ing

the

evidence

material

intentionally

don't

provide,

or

to

laborer

of

facts

says

"don't

know,"

"don't

remember,"

or

unit

of

choose

and

employ

persons

that

all

the

above

statements

do

disaantage.

This

has

caused

the

evidence

difficult.

Workers

party

The

author

thinks

that

the

correct

application,

constructive

can

in

this

situation.

以上为

有道桌面词典

翻译结果，仅供参考。

法律英语翻译

If approved by both parties demonstrate the technical supervision departments identified, because the quality of supply of goods own defects, loss or claim arising, the supplier shall be held accountable under the law. .

Suppliers he the responsibility of the buyer of the set and confirmed in writing by the supplier of the business requirements and specifications.

The two sides agreed that the diss arising from this agreement by the defendant, the jurisdiction of local people's court.

Agreed by the supplier.

朗读显示对应的拉丁字符的拼音

字典 - 查看字典详细内容

翻译以下任意网站 Confidencial-西班牙Louvre-法国Spiegel Online-德国Venezuela Tuya-西班牙语BBC News-英国Philadelphia Inquirer-美国Vogue-法国Telegraph.co.uk-英国Komika Magasin-瑞典语Berlingske.dk-丹麦Yomuiri Online-日本

法律英语翻译为law.

law

n. 法律；规律；法治；法学；诉讼；司法界

词组短语：

criminal law 刑法

law enforcement 法律的实施

rule of law 法治；法律规则

civil law 民法

contract law 合同法

in law 在法律上；依法

international law 法；公法

common law 习惯法；不成文法

administrative law 行政法

例句：

1.We argued with them about the new law.

我们同他们辩论那项新法律。

2.Every citizen may claim the protection of the law.

每个公民都可以要求受到法律的保护。

3.We shall need all the votes we can get to push the new law through.

我们需要我们所能得到的所有选票，才好使新的法律得以通过。

The supplier shall bear corresponding responsibility according to law for any losses or claims arising out of quality defect of the supplied goods as evaluated and proved by the technical supervision department approved by both parties.

Both parties agree that any dis arising out of this agreement shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the people's court of the place where the defendant is located.

Agreed by the supplier.

The supplier shall bear corresponding responsibilities in accordance with the legal provisions if the technical supervision department agreed by both parties proves the loss or claim were caused by the quality defect of the supplied goods.

The supplier is liable for satisfying the requirements and specifications of the business set by the Buyer and confirmed by the Supplier in writing.

Both parties agree that diss arising from this Agreement shall be under the jurisdiction of the People's Court in the place where the defendant is located.

Approved by the Supplier.

法律[fǎ lǜ]

law; statute; codex; cods; doom ;